Skip to main content

Attorney General’s Marijuana Merger Investigations Could Get Him Impeached Under New Resolution

Three dozen members of the House of Representatives introduced a resolution on Tuesday calling for an inquiry into the possible impeachment of Attorney General William Barr because he “abused the power of his office” to improperly investigate marijuana businesses and allegedly engaged in other unlawful conduct.

The resolution, which is being led by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), states that the attorney general “has taken deliberate actions that violate the rights of the American people, assault the principle of impartial administration of justice, and undermine the constitutional structure of separation of powers across three co-equal branches of Government.”

It says that Barr “abused the power of his office to initiate pretextual antitrust investigations into ‘unpopular’ American corporations in the cannabis, automobile, and technology industries.”

That allegation comes from a Justice Department whistleblower who publicly revealed this month that 10 antitrust investigations targeting cannabis companies were launched at the direction of the attorney general, who was said to have made the decision based on his personal animus for the industry.

“He’s using antitrust not for the purpose of helping consumers and businesses that might be disadvantaged by monopoly, but doing it as a vehicle for his social policies, which is unheard of,” Cohen told Marijuana Moment in a phone interview, referring to the attorney general.

The whistleblower didn’t see “any practices that are antitrust in nature, but they said the problem was on the fifth floor, which is where Barr’s office resides and apparently he doesn’t like marijuana so he went after them,” the lawmaker said.

At a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week, the whistleblower argued that there wasn’t an appropriate basis for the investigations, which at one point accounted for one-third of Justice Department Antitrust Division cases.

The department’s Office of Professional Responsibility, to which the complaint was referred, ultimately concluded that no rules had been violated in ordering the investigations, regardless of the allegation about Barr’s prejudice. That said, the matter is also separately being looked into by the inspector general, according to a June memo.

“I think it’s just unfortunate what they’re doing,” Cohen said of the memo.

While the new resolution states that other unrelated “investigations misused the resources Congress appropriated for the Department of Justice to harass and intimidate companies based on President Donald J. Trump’s whims and without a proper legal predicate for such investigations,” the whistleblower specified that the marijuana-specific inquiries were connected to Barr’s alleged bias, not the president’s.

However, he did make clear that department resources were wasted and questioned the factual basis for the investigations. All told, across six of the 10 investigations for which data are available, 5,965,000 documents were produced by the cannabis companies under inquiry. A small fraction were actually reviewed by Justice Department personnel.

“Attorney General Barr has undermined our judicial system and perverted the rule of law,” Cohen said in a press release. “Barr obstructs justice by favoring the President’s friends and political allies. He abuses his power by using the Department of Justice to harass, intimidate and attack disfavored Americans and the President’s political opponents. My oath to support and defend the Constitution compels me to confront this corruption.”

He and the measure’s 35 cosponsors are asking for the Judiciary Committee to explore the potential for impeachment proceedings for the attorney general. Those cosponsors include Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Maxine Waters (D-CA).

Of course, the marijuana allegations represent just one part of a broader rationale for a congressional inquiry. The lawmakers also criticized the nation’s top law enforcement official for his role in directing the disassembly of protestors in Washington, D.C., his move to clear former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn of criminal charges and the controversial firing on a federal judge, among other matters.

Cohen also talked to Marijuana Moment about a point he made during last week’s Judiciary Committee hearing on the Barr allegations about how cannabis criminalization fosters distrust between communities of color and police, as black and brown people are significantly more likely to be arrested for a marijuana offense compared to white people despite comparable rates of consumption.

“It’s a street crime. There are dealers, but most individuals get busted on the street smoking a joint and that’s when police and African Americans come in contact,” he said. “African Americans are anywhere from six or seven to 10 times as likely to get arrested for smoking marijuana as caucasians, and yet there’s no indication that they necessarily smoke at any greater numbers. It’s a breeding ground for this discontent because anybody that gets busted for smoking marijuana is going to have a chip on their shoulder towards the law enforcement, towards society and towards the structure, the establishment, that allows such to happen.”

Advocates and lawmakers have made similar arguments in recent weeks as Congress has debated policing reform amid the civil unrest that’s emanated from recent police killings of black Americans. They’ve said that policing reform should be coupled with a conversation about changing marijuana policies to mitigate unnecessary law enforcement interactions.

The congressman said the issue reminds him of the 1995 song “Ain’t Hurtin’ Nobody” by John Prime.

“When I hear that song, I kind of think about people smoking marijuana,” he said. “‘Ain’t hurtin’ nobody, ain’t hurtin’ no one.’”

While no lawmakers ultimately filed cannabis amendments to the House-passed policing bill, there’s still time left in this Congress to take up standalone marijuana legislation. Cohen said it’s “possible” the House will take up the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment, and Expungement (MORE) Act before the end of session, but he raised doubts about its prospects in the Senate.

“It’s certainly gotten to be more bipartisan in the House,” he said. “The Senate is a little slower to respond on some of these things, and this is one where they’ve been slower to respond. And [Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)] is good on hemp, but that’s about as far as he goes.”

Read the text of the resolution to launch in impeachment inquiry into the attorney general below: 

Barr Resolution by Marijuana Moment on Scribd

Bipartisan Senators File Marijuana And CBD Research Amendment To Defense Spending Bill

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Original Article Source: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/attorney-generals-marijuana-merger-investigations-could-get-him-impeached-under-new-resolution/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Church Faces Potential Lawsuit Over Medical Marijuana Opposition

Political committees concerned with marijuana law reform in four states have waged an information war over the past year, first to qualify cannabis initiatives for the ballot, and then to support or oppose those measures in the lead-up to last week’s midterm elections. In total, over  $12.9 million in cash and in-kind services was spent attempting to convince voters about these marijuana ballot measures. Now that voters have had their say, Marijuana Moment decided to calculate how much each “yes” and “no” vote cost the committees on either side of the debate. Our calculations are based on dollars raised and disclosed before the election, since final totals of actual expenditures won’t be available until December or January reports required in the states that voted on cannabis. Michigan In Michigan, where voters approved marijuana legalization , our calculations show that the two anti-legalization committees spent about $1.28 per “no” vote, as they raised $2.37 million for ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could CBD Lead To The Development Of Safer Antipsychotic Medications?

Antipsychotic medications are important for managing a number of different psychiatric ailments, including bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, and even dementia. These drugs can greatly improve the manageability of symptoms that often distort one’s experience of reality. They can also create major mood disruptions and lead to a number of behavioral and emotional difficulties. Antipsychotic and anti-psychosis medications can be life-changing for people with such disorders, enabling them to live more normal and manageable lives without their symptoms taking over. These drugs work by regulating neurotransmitters in the brain so that naturally occurring imbalances and dysfunctions no longer disrupt mental and emotional processes. Often, reaching this outcome is much easier said than done; it can take a lot of time to find courses and combinations of treatments that work. It’s sometimes necessary to make adjustments to find the right balance for the individual and it’s not unusual for outc...
Post a Comment
Read more

NY Dem Chair Warns Against Passing Voter-Supported Marijuana Legalization Bill

The head of New York’s Democratic Party said on Thursday that if the state Senate votes on a marijuana legalization bill, his party’s lawmakers run the risk of alienating voters and losing reelection next year. Jay Jacobs, the state party chairman, claimed that several “far progressive” measures, including cannabis legalization, lack popularity in certain areas across the state such as Long Island and upstate New York. He cautioned lawmakers against putting the issue to a vote, arguing that voters would “throw us out of office.” “It could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” he told Newsday. Polling doesn’t support that conclusion, though. According to a March 2019 survey from Quinnipiac, 65 percent of New Yorkers are in favor of allowing adults to legally possess cannabis for personal use. That includes 63 percent of respondents in upstate New York and 65 percent of those living in the suburbs. Sixty-six percent of independents statewide also back ending marijuana prohibit...
Post a Comment
Read more